Attack calculation incorrect #25

Closed
opened 2023-08-28 17:04:15 +02:00 by techogre · 3 comments

image

The above assumes OCV 2. The third panel shows a miss, assuming the target DCV is taken into account. See pages 94-95 of the Basic book for details.

![image](/attachments/cbdc3823-0f54-48dd-952b-f631ad5c539b) The above assumes OCV 2. The third panel shows a miss, assuming the target DCV is taken into account. See pages 94-95 of the Basic book for details.
132 KiB
Owner

With a target roll of 14, the attacker total OCV is 3, no ?
So with a roll score of 10, it hits target with DCV 4 or less. Am I wrong ?

With a target roll of 14, the attacker total OCV is 3, no ? So with a roll score of 10, it hits target with DCV 4 or less. Am I wrong ?
Collaborator

Enhancement.

Margin (of success) covers the DCV use case explicitly. When we support targeting and attack automation, being more explicit makes sense.

Until then, margin of success = DCV hit as well as being useful for contests of skills or for when the GM doesn't want to reveal the difficulty of a task (or the DCV of the opponent).

Example: an OCV 7 character that executes a Killing Strike maneuver (-2 OCV) automatically calculates to a 16- roll, and the result calculates the margin of success (which = DCV) accurately. Tested with mulitple OCVs and maneuvers and no errors detected.

Enhancement. Margin (of success) covers the DCV use case explicitly. When we support targeting and attack automation, being more explicit makes sense. Until then, margin of success = DCV hit as well as being useful for contests of skills or for when the GM doesn't want to reveal the difficulty of a task (or the DCV of the opponent). Example: an OCV 7 character that executes a Killing Strike maneuver (-2 OCV) automatically calculates to a 16- roll, and the result calculates the margin of success (which = DCV) accurately. Tested with mulitple OCVs and maneuvers and no errors detected.
Author

Then "Margin" should be replaced by "DCV Hit". As it stands it is confusing.

Then "Margin" should be replaced by "DCV Hit". As it stands it is confusing.
uberwald referenced this issue from a commit 2023-08-30 09:46:49 +02:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: public/fvtt-hero-system-6#25
No description provided.